The story of Quattro, and its death-by-prejudice, was a harsh lesson learned by Sigma, that most buyers of Foveon tech were more in love with the 1:1:1 principle than with getting the best IQ out of a 3-layer sensor. Just read my comments, they are factual in entirety, whereas marc’s replies are a jumbled mix of occasional facts, numerous errors and prejudices regarding Quattro tech, and blind repetition of errors even after I correct them. I’m not repeating going over stuff that you won’t learn.įor any third party readers, (not marc, his fingers are in his ears so he won’t learn), here is the link to the prior discussion. TN re:Quattro, we have been over this before. You're way off, if you may think, gear brands introduce a new FF Sensor with every new iteration - i said it all before.u don't understand. And you're some kind of 'talker', because ~3K posts into literally -just- since 2020 speaks for itself - you've got a comment for literally everything, even you arent right, or not having the knowledge info some specific thing. You've an issue with ppl which are not agree with you - especially when you're *not* being right, but you do everything, to let it look like it would be that way, no you're totally wrong here. You have a serious issue with language and anger management, and you try just killer rethoric, but you've no clue about Sensor development cycles. And you can keep your 'period', and talk with your kindergarden boys into that term, same as i am not your 'Dude' or bro, speaking of your language. PS: a sentence, and especially your argument doesn't get better, or right into that term, only because you mean to do so, and write 'period' or in caps letters.īTN1, i don't argue with you anymore, it's priceless, into what way you do meant to talk with me here, enough being said. Have you ever thought about, to worship and appreaciate the things you own - instead of always buying new, and lust for more? Well.perhaps not. It's despite what you mean to be true - not the world we're living into. And you always want to be right, but this topic isn't into your favor. It shows only one thing - i see what you did here, and some type, kind of arrogance. You do have an issue with yourself, i'd suggest, and perhaps you should try anger managment. Perhaps you also overlooked the fact that sensor development costs millions in R&D and testing. You feel insecure, and have to back up your statement with these sentences without having a factual argument regarding Sensor. 'It matter not what is or isn't, it is about getting sales, period. That PR talk has move on to Sensor sizes and MP, and guess who has been winning that battle. So either they compete to what is selling or they don't, END of Story.īlank Brand has literally a ARMY of yTubers and now moving on to tiktok to build their PR assault. The Camera isn't just a tool to those that make it, sales NUMBERs determine their ability to stay in the game. Some folks have yet to figure that part out yet.

This isn't about gear fetishy or whatever that means, this is about Cold Hard Reality in a still shrinking Camera Gear Market. It matter not what is or isn't, it is about getting sales, period. So it is always funny how I get these, well what's wrong with their current sensor talk. My most most used camera daily, weekly, and yearly is my Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Digital Camera with a 20.1MP 1' High Sensitivity MOS Sensor. There’s also the irony that a company whose cameras have become most synonymous with video capture is using an AF technology that struggles most with shooting video.Īt the end of the article we came to the conclusion the shortcomings of CDAF technology don’t appear to be inherent problems with the focusing technique itself, but limited due to the sensor readout speeds and processing power of the cameras – both things that will inevitably improve with each new generation of camera as sensors and processors continue to improve.

Below is a quote from the linked article: ‘During the development of the S5, Panasonic’s engineers discovered they didn’t have to lean on the machine-learning trained algorithms for both subject recognition and movement tracking: they could combine the machine-learned recognition with their existing, faster, distance and movement algorithms, which freed-up processing power to run the process much more frequently.’ In addition to explaining the fundamental differences between CDAF and PDAF, we explained where Panasonic had improved its DFD technology with its then-recently-announced S5 and what could be done to further bring CDAF technology more in line with the performance we have become accustomed to with PDAF systems.

Panasonic full frame rumors